Hi Kapil,
if those were real systems the one with 140 AMPs would have twice the number of nodes, probably 4 instead of 2. Of course this would result in twice the processing power, CPU/IO.
Now it depends where's the bottleneck, server side/client side/network. Only if the 70 AMP system was saturated the 140 AMP will load faster.
But if this is just a hypothetical question about doubling the number of AMPs on the same system there will hardly be any difference, because total IO/CPU/network bandwith will not change.
Dieter
Hi Kapil,
if those were real systems the one with 140 AMPs would have twice the number of nodes, probably 4 instead of 2. Of course this would result in twice the processing power, CPU/IO.
Now it depends where's the bottleneck, server side/client side/network. Only if the 70 AMP system was saturated the 140 AMP will load faster.
But if this is just a hypothetical question about doubling the number of AMPs on the same system there will hardly be any difference, because total IO/CPU/network bandwith will not change.
Dieter